step three.step 1.step one. Crucial Logical Review of Sexting Procedures

Decimal outcome of the fresh new 79 education relating to sexting frequency integrated within our opinion (pick part “Phase step one” above) showed that mobile incorporate is one of referenced communications route when inquiring throughout the sexting (letter = 28). Many studies find out about delivering sexts (n = 69). Images (letter = 74) and video clips (n = 39) was in fact many believed media structure and you can “sexual” (n = 30) try the most famous adjective accustomed define sexts. Most knowledge didn’t build specific the timeframe of one’s scale (letter = 45). Just a fraction of degree (letter = 16) experienced the brand new addressee (of these giving) or the transmitter (of these getting) and just dos studies defined the reason for sexting one of number one issues. The brand new reaction types very used to determine sexting was in fact the latest Likert scale (n = 28) and you may dichotomic solutions (letter = 24). One of training because of the operate away from delivering, very analyzed they via an effective mono-product (letter = 34). Lastly, only n = 21 claimed people accuracy index otherwise proof the fresh new validity of methods applied. Come across Additional Pointers S6 for more info.

3.step one.dos. Conversation Group Overall performance

Dialogue communities characterized around around three different varieties of personal dating: (a) friendships with every day contact, trust, and you will esteem, (b) relationships dating, like the qualities from friendship plus destination and you may uniqueness, and you may (c) dating with others they understand merely on line, having who they have shorter contact and on the whom they are doing maybe not discover really. The essential difference between a guy you simply see on the internet and you will a stranger is actually considered to be the second your do not cam regularly with, you have never talked so you can, otherwise have not designed to talk to, and also you do not have one information about. New conversation groups agreed you to definitely “private bits” referred to genitals plus the backside since sexual parts of each other boys’ and you can girls’ government, with the addition of chest because the sexual elements of girls’ government. The newest talk communities considered that all potential steps had been protected for the evaluating A great-SextS. Based on its solutions, adjectives you to definitely greatest explained (a) nude pictographic contents was indeed “naked” (n = 7) and you can “indicating dick/vagina, chest, and/otherwise backside” (letter = 4), (b) semi-naked material had been “protected by undies” (n = 6) and you may “almost nude” (n = 5), and you will (c) neither naked nor semi-nude was indeed “dressed as well as in a sexy pose” (n = 13) and you may “seductive” (letter = 3). Select Additional Recommendations S7 for more information.

step three.dos. Proof of Concurrent Legitimacy

Versus remark training to your sexting prevalence, the overall prevalence regarding sending sexts reported inside study (95% CI: forty two.9%, 58%) is greater than one to stated by the Klettke mais aussi al. (95% CI: 2%, 19%) and you may Madigan mais aussi al. (95% CI: 13%, 17%), and you can some more than the fresh new stratified imagine from inside the training collecting analysis during the 2018 (95% CI: 22%, 46%) believed within our constant meta-study . All of our reception price regarding sexts (95% CI: 43%, 71%) was also greater than compared to Klettke mais aussi al. (95% CI: eleven.7%, 19.6%) and you may Madigan et al. (95% CI: 23.1%, 31.7%), but are similar to the stratified imagine inside studies collecting analysis for the 2018 (95% CI: 22%, 46%) thought inside our constant meta-investigation .

Result of https://kissbrides.com/fr/blog/femme-noire-chaude/ empirical studies that have types of Language teens, such as the estimates off Quesada mais aussi al. , into voluntary sending away from intimate photos otherwise video in order to a great spouse (95% CI: 15%, twenty four.1%), to help you a friend/friend (95% CI: 8%, 15.3%) in order to individuals merely understood online (95% CI: 4.9%, 11%), correspond with men and women obtained within our studies whenever pooling degrees of explicitness (95% CI: 20.3%, twenty-eight.6%; 14.3%, 20.4%; and you will dos.4%, 5.5%, respectively). The imagine to the voluntary giving of texting having sexual blogs so you’re able to somebody merely known on line (95% CI: step 3.2%, 8.4%) along with concurs with the quote (95% CI: 7.2%, 12%). Although not, if addressee is actually a professional companion (95% CI: 18.4%, 28.1%) otherwise a pal/associate (95% CI: 11.5%, 19.8%), the prices are slightly high (95% CI: 31.4%, 40.6% and you will 22.8%, 30%, respectively).

Compartilhe